You are here: Markets » Full text: Moody’s upgrades Turkey’s government bond ratings to Baa3, stable outlook
Editors note: Moody’s released the following press release yesterday in conjunction with a ratings action it took on Turkish sovereign debt.
Moody’s Investors Service has today upgraded Turkey’s government bond ratings by one notch to Baa3 from Ba1, and has assigned a stable outlook.
The key drivers for today’s rating action are:
1. Recent and expected future improvements in key economic and public finance metrics.
2. Progress on structural and institutional reforms that Moody’s expects will reduce existing vulnerabilities to shocks to international capital flows over time.
Moody’s decision to assign a stable outlook on Turkey’s ratings reflects the rating agency’s expectation of continued prudence in the management of public finances and sustained momentum behind current structural and institutional reforms.
The first driver underlying Moody’s decision to upgrade Turkey’s sovereign rating to Baa3 is the improvement in the country’s economic and fiscal metrics. Since the beginning of 2009, Turkey’s debt burden has fallen by 10 percentage points to a manageable 36% of GDP, and Moody’s expects this decline to continue in the coming years. Moreover, Turkey’s ability to finance its outstanding stock of debt is supported by the relatively low and decreasing share of its debt that is denominated in foreign currency (it has fallen from 46.3% in 2003 to 27.4% in 2012). The maturity profile of the central government’s debt stock has also lengthened significantly to 4.6 years (and the maturity of its foreign debt stock is now over 9 years), which reduces its vulnerability to interest-rate increases. Furthermore, the government’s revenue streams have demonstrated resilience in recent years. For example, even in the face of contraction in real GDP growth by 4.8% in 2009, general government revenues increased by over two percentage points in that year and have remained on an upward trajectory since that time. These improvements, when considered in conjunction with the size, wealth, and diversification of the domestic economy, increase the sovereign’s ability to withstand a crystallisation of balance of payment risks over the short to medium term.
The second driver of today’s rating action is the progress that the government has made on a wide-ranging institutional reform programme that Moody’s believes will gradually erode the country’s external vulnerabilities over a longer time horizon. The government’s policy actions are addressing the role that energy plays in driving up the current account deficit, the weak savings rate and the country’s overall competitiveness. Taken as a whole, this reform agenda reflects that the government is taking action to address these vulnerabilities. For example, on 1 January 2013, a new incentive scheme to increase investment in personal pensions came into effect, further to which the number of participants and the amount of contributions increased by 13.5% and 12.1% in the first four months of the year, respectively, thereby significantly outpacing the kind of growth observed over calendar year 2012. The government has also adopted a new commercial code in 2012 that will improve corporate governance standards and overall competitiveness. Moreover, with a view to addressing the structural underpinnings of Turkey’s external vulnerabilities, the government is pursuing a strategy of focusing on energy efficiency and reducing reliance on imported hydrocarbons through nuclear power, domestic energy sources and renewables. Energy imports are a key contributor to the current account deficit (in fact, in 2012, the current account deficit, excluding energy, registered a small surplus), and Moody’s expects that the government’s energy policy will cause those pressures to decline over time.
More generally, Turkey’s rating is appropriately positioned at Baa3 because its key economic and public finance metrics, which are generally stronger than those of Baa3-rated peers, balance out its external vulnerabilities, which are generally greater than those of most other Baa3 issuers. Specifically, Turkey’s economic strengths — its size, wealth, economic diversification and growth prospects — and its public finances are stronger than many other countries in its rating category. However, Turkey has some of the highest external vulnerabilities — as measured by the current account deficit and the external vulnerability indicator (which measures short-term foreign debt obligations in the economy as a proportion of foreign exchange reserves) — within the investment-grade sovereign rating universe. These sources of vulnerability have weighed on the rating and will likely continue to do so for some time. All told, the balance between Turkey’s fundamental strengths and ongoing vulnerabilities has shifted to a stronger overall credit risk profile due to improved competitiveness, structural economic reform, and increasingly robust government financial strength.
WHAT COULD MOVE THE RATING UP/DOWN
According to Moody’s, upward movement in Turkey’s sovereign rating will be constrained by balance-of-payments factors while external imbalances remain large. Upward rating pressure could materialise in the event of structural reductions in these vulnerabilities or further improvements in Turkey’s institutional environment or competitiveness. Reductions in political risk that may emanate from progress on the peace process with the Kurdish insurgency, while credit positive, would not result in upward rating action in the absence of other credit improvements.
Moody’s would consider downgrading Turkey’s sovereign rating if improvements in the public finances were to be materially reversed. A sudden and sustained halt in foreign capital flows would also exert downward pressure on the rating.
As part of today’s rating actions, Moody’s has adjusted Turkey’s long-term foreign-currency bond ceiling to Baa1 from Baa2, and its long-term foreign-currency deposit ceiling to Baa3 from Ba2. Turkey’s short-term foreign-currency deposit ceiling has risen to P-3 from NP; the country’s short-term foreign-currency bond ceiling remains at P-2. There are no changes to Turkey’s A3 local-currency bond and deposit ceilings.
The principal methodology used in this rating was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in September 2008. Please see the Credit Policy page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.
About Guest Author
This page is a post from outside of Credit Writedowns' regular contributors.
No related posts.
Like us on Facebook
Follow Edward on Twitter
Latest Subscriber Posts
- The so-called new economy and the disintermediation of the rent seekers
- Economic and market themes: 2014-04-21 United States
- Could the US economy accelerate higher in 2014
- Secular versus cyclical factors in equity markets
- Dealing with confirmation bias in macro analysis at market turning points
- Risk for Greece and European periphery from Ukraine crisis escalation mounts
- Economic and market themes: 2014-04-11 – Greece
- Thoughts on Greek bonds, Asian data and resource gamesmanship
- Edward Harrison’s Ten Surprises for 2014, Update 1
- Some thoughts on Ukraine, part 2
- Some thoughts on Ukraine, part 1
- Amazon’s new TV streaming strategy reinforces its incremental approach
- Relief rally in emerging markets
- European, Japanese, and Ukrainian-Russian deflation
- Economic and market themes: 2014-03-28
Recent Blog Posts
- News: 2014-04-22
- Four key reasons for capex accelerating
- ECB Action: Just a Question of Time?
- On Europe’s move toward QE to prevent deflation
- The lower bound of central bank effectiveness
- Ten lessons from Charles Keating on corporatism and control fraud
- On the persistence of inadequate ideas like the money multiplier
- Can the Jobs Data Give the Dollar Another Leg Up?
- The US jobs market is healing
- Jumbos still cheaper than conforming mortgages
- Calm before the Storm?
- Eurozone credit contraction continues
- Emerging Market Equity Allocation Model for Q2 2014
- More Thoughts about Potential for QE from the ECB
- The big disconnect between leverage and spreads
Daily Links Posts
- What do negative interest rates do?
- A Short History Lesson On Ukraine and Crimea
- Economic consequences of income inequality
- The BoE’s sharp shock to monetary illusions
- Marc Faber: China’s Malinvestment Unwind ‘Will Be a Disaster’
- Another Short History Lesson On Russia and Ukraine
- What are the differences between QE1, QE2 and QE3?
- The long decline of the Great British Pound
- Bank reserves and the falling loan to deposit ratio at US banks
- Turmoil in emerging markets: What’s missing from the story?
- How money matters: The Old Lady fails to get an “A”
- The Dummy’s Guide to the US Banking Crisis
- Four signs of economic slowdown in China
- On Europe’s move toward QE to prevent deflation
- The growing mess which will be left behind by the Abenomics experiment
- Chart of the day: US Manufacturing Employment, 1960-2012
- Bitcoin is not a currency
- More on the failure of Abenomics
- Chart of the day: Dow 1928-1932
- Interest rates and deflation
-  No Good Greek Current Account Surplus w/Yanis Varoufakis and Tech w/ Alex Daley
-  Marshall Auerback talks Confidence Game in Europe & Karl Denninger on HFT
-  Tech Market Bubble? with Alex Daley and Howard Lindzon
-  Privatization of Space? and Big Banks in Foreign Policy with Nomi Prins
-  Big Banks and Political Power with Nomi Prins and Anthony Randazzo
-  Paul Craig Roberts: IMF loans will hand Ukraine over to private banks
-  Euro Politics behind Greek Bond Sale w/Yanis Varoufakis & Fed Policy w/Tim Duy
-  Ann Pettifor: Private banks create 95% of UK money
-  Making $$ in the Money Market w/ Marc Chandler and Asian Econ with Daniel Alpert
-  Peter Schiff: It's not the weather, the economy is headed towards recession!