• About
  • Contact
  • Archives
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reading List
Credit Writedowns
  • Home
  • Economics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Politics
    • Political Economy
  • Finance Data
    • Banking
    • Credit Crisis Timeline
      • Banking Crisis Timeline
    • Bank Writedowns
      • More Bank Writedowns
  • Markets
    • Housing
    • News
    • More
  • Blogroll
  • Economic News
  • RSS
  • Daily Newsletter

Household Net Worth – Back to the Old Normal

Markets | John Lounsbury | July 27, 2010 7:00 am |

There is a new graph on the internet that will be seen and discussed at length in the coming days and weeks.  It shows how household net worth has changed over the past 59 years.

The graph below, originally from Macro and Other Market Musings, has been annotated by Barry Ritholtz at The Big Picture.

What is evident in this graph is another appearance of the effects of the two historic bubbles of the past half century. That the household net worth experienced bubbles is evident by another annotation of the graph that I have performed, below:

The relationship between household net worth and disposable income has returned to what I have labeled as the "normal range" for the 59 years.  I think this is reasonable because 56% of the time the ratio has been between approximately 465% and 515%.  I have labeled the years between 1973 and 1987 as a "depression" in the ratio (25% of the time) and the recent bubble years occupy the remaining 19% of the time.

It is worthwhile to also look at how real disposable personal income has changed over this time interval.  The St. Louis Fed FRED data base graph is shown below with the author’s notations to show the various time periods identified in the graph above.

There are only a few things to note about the real disposable personal income numbers, and none will be surprising to readers with any awareness of economic issues. These are:

  1. The early normal period (1952-1972) is estimated to have an average real annual growth rate average between the two horizontal reference lines.
  2. The second normal period (1988-1996) also has an average between the two horizontal reference lines, but obviously lower than the earlier normal period.
  3. The third normal period (2008 to date) has no readings between the two horizontal reference lines;  clearly the recent drop in the ratio in the earlier graphs is due to a large drop in household net worth and not from any significant increase in disposable personal income.
  4. The depression period (1973-1987) also had an average well within the area between the two horizontal reference lines, but lower than the preceding normal period and higher than the subsequent normal period.
  5. The period of the two bubbles (1997-2007) clearly has two parts; before 2002 the average is clearly in the area between the two horizontal reference lines; from 2003 on, the average is very near or slightly below the lower line.

I have gone to the trouble of having this discussion to assure that the variation seen in the initial graphs is primarily due to household net worth and not to real personal disposable income.  Only since 2003 has the denominator (income) had a significant impact on the change.  That impact is to increase the height of the second bubble and increase the level of the latest normal period.

What we have is a demonstration that there has not been a decline in the level of household prosperity compared to most of the history reviewed, merely from a bubble of household prosperity.  As is the case with all bubbles, they are not sustainable.  When it comes to household net worth, we have simply gone back to what was a long standing relationship.

When it comes to household net worth, it appears that the new normal is not much different from the old normal, at least so far.

Share
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts

  • The Found Lost Decade
  • Stock Market Capitalization Exceeds GDP
  • Expecting A Range Bound Market For 2010 Unless We Double Dip
  • US Pension Funds are implicitly betting on Dow 40,000
  • Bond Bubble?

Tags: investing, wealth
  • Tweet This!Tweet This
  • Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
  • Digg it!Digg This
  • Add to Delicious!Save to delicious
  • Stumble itStumble it
  • Subscribe by RSSRSS Feed
« James Montier does MMT «
» Risk On Trading Picks Up Ahead Of Case-Shiller Report »
  • attitude_check
    Of course most dynamic system's tend to overshoot equilibrium. It wouldn't surprise me to see net worth go south of the numbers seen in the 70's before returning o the normal range. The present bounce is most likely due to the very rapid initial descent, and intentional asset value "propping" by the Fed, particularly in housing. I don't think they will be able to hold-off the required house value reset without stoking huge inflation, which will spike the income denominator.
blog comments powered by Disqus

    Follow Us

    • RSS RSSSubscribe now!
    • Comments CommentsRSS
    • Daily DailyE-mail Newsletter
    • Weekly WeeklyE-mail Newsletter
    •  E-mailContact us
    •  TwitterFollow us
    •  DeliciousNews links
    •  FacebookFriend Edward
    •  YoutubeOur videos
     

    Contextual Search

    Lijit Search

    About the author

    John Lounsbury

    John Lounsbury provides comprehensive financial planning and investment advisory services to a small number of families on a fee only basis. He has a background which includes 34 years with a major international corporation, 25 years in R&D management and corporate staff positions. John is also one of the ten most followed writers at Seeking Alpha and a Senior Contributor at TheStreet.com and Real Money.

    • Visit website

    Polls

    If Alan Greenspan had raised rates in 2003, the US would have double dipped

    • No (57%, 139 Votes)
    • Yes (43%, 108 Votes)

    Total Voters: 246

    Loading ... Loading ...
    • Polls Archive

    Recent Comments

    Recent Posts

    • Political Risk Rises In Romania, Stay Short RON
    • Little News from US Jobs and Trichet, Dollar Softens
    • Waiting for Trichet
    • One Swallow Doesn’t Make A Summer, But…
    • Not Content With France, Now It’s Poland Too!
    • Wolfgang Munchau Has It (More or Less) Right
    • The Odd Couple
    • Spain’s Unemployment Continues To Rise
    • On critiquing Obama’s economic policy and other links
    • Will the Risk Appetite be Sustained In North America?
    • Following the Real Money
    • An Addendum to the ‘Flations – Gold $5,000
    • India Booms
    • On helicopter drops aka free money and other links
    • On The Shoulders Of Giants – How Spain Is Destined To Follow In Germany’s Footsteps

    Popular Posts

    • Have we underestimated Chinese consumption?
    • Why the U.S. economy is weak
    • Romania In The Spotlight: Stay Short RON
    • White: 'Burden of Debt' Will Slow Global Growth
    • The Odd Couple
    • An Addendum to the 'Flations - Gold $5,000
    • Links: 2010-08-29
    • Bond Bubble?
    • Links: 2010-08-30
    • The Baron Münchhausen Effect
    • On critiquing Obama's economic policy and other links
    • On The Shoulders Of Giants – How Spain Is Destined To Follow In Germany’s Footsteps
    • Following the Real Money
    • Starbucks' closure list
    • Eastern European Concerns To Rise, Hungary To Come Under Further Pressure

    Most Viewed

    • Switzerland threatened with bankruptcy
    • Letterman's Top 10 George Bush moments
    • Is the State of California bankrupt?
    • The Dummy's Guide to the US Banking Crisis
    • Marc Faber: I advise every American to hold his gold outside of the United States
    • Top ten predictions for the 2009 global economy
    • Chart of the day: Dow 1928-1932
    • The recession is over but the depression has just begun
    • The top 25 European banks by assets
    • The Swedish banking crisis response - a model for the future?
    • Albert Edwards: Global economy to roll over in six to nine months' time; bearish for shares
    • Quantitative easing: printing money like mad to ward off deflation
    • US GDP growth rate is unsustainable; recovery will fade
    • The Fake Recovery
    • Brazil: Look who's got a Sovereign Wealth Fund
    • Chart of the day: unemployment as a recession indicator
    • The origins of the next crisis
    • Hugh Hendry: China – The Emperor has no clothes
    • 1931
    • China's empty city: the emperor really has no clothes
Avatars by Sterling Adventures

    Our Site

    If you want to find out what's going on in the credit crisis, you've come to the right place.

    See the Credit Crisis Timeline, which includes a timeline of major crisis events and links to a list of crisis events organized by financial institution. This is the most comprehensive data set of credit crisis-related events on the Internet.

    To contact us, click here.

    See more information about us.

    Credit Writedowns

    • About
    • Contact
    • Archives
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Reading List

Disclaimer: All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. Creditwritedowns.com is not a financial advisor, and does not recommend the purchase of any stock or advise on the suitability of any trade or investment. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.


Copyright © 2008-2010 — Credit Writedowns and Global Macro Advisors, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Zenko Magazine Theme designed by WPZOOM.
Tynt tracer script