<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Rogers is still bullish on commodities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/jim-rogers-is-still-bullish-on-commodities.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/jim-rogers-is-still-bullish-on-commodities.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Corliss</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/jim-rogers-is-still-bullish-on-commodities.html#comment-58112</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Corliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/jim-rogers-is-still-bullish-on-commodities.html#comment-58112</guid>
		<description>I have the upmost respect for Mr. Rogers, but I don&#039;t think he fully appreciates how most global agriculture is still woefully inefficient, but improving. As efficiency continues to improve, agricultural supply will increase sufficiently to inhibit sustainable price run-ups caused by increased demand. In the short run, marginal demand from hedge-funds may push forward prices higher from time to time, but farmers will simply increase supply, pushing prices lower again. Unless you&#039;re a short-term &quot;trader&quot; - something Mr. Rogers always claims he is not - then you&#039;re better off playing oil or other commodities with steep supply curves to counter potential inflationary pressures caused by &quot;helicopter Ben&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the upmost respect for Mr. Rogers, but I don&#8217;t think he fully appreciates how most global agriculture is still woefully inefficient, but improving. As efficiency continues to improve, agricultural supply will increase sufficiently to inhibit sustainable price run-ups caused by increased demand. In the short run, marginal demand from hedge-funds may push forward prices higher from time to time, but farmers will simply increase supply, pushing prices lower again. Unless you&#8217;re a short-term &#8220;trader&#8221; &#8211; something Mr. Rogers always claims he is not &#8211; then you&#8217;re better off playing oil or other commodities with steep supply curves to counter potential inflationary pressures caused by &#8220;helicopter Ben&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/jim-rogers-is-still-bullish-on-commodities.html#comment-58104</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/jim-rogers-is-still-bullish-on-commodities.html#comment-58104</guid>
		<description>This is just silly. Doesn&#039;t Rogers realize that China is a big bubble waiting to burst? What does he think will happen to commodities when it does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just silly. Doesn&#8217;t Rogers realize that China is a big bubble waiting to burst? What does he think will happen to commodities when it does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/01/jim-rogers-is-still-bullish-on-commodities.html/feed ) in 0.14630 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:07 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:07 am UTC -->
