<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Morgan Stanley expects 10-year yields to rise 220 bps in 2010</title> <atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html</link> <description>a finance news and opinion site</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: nittany222</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7705</link> <dc:creator>nittany222</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:15:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7705</guid> <description>Recall that this 220 bps rate increase could be good news for pension sponsors, as liabilities would decrease 25-35% under such a scenario.  Depending on the nature of the plan investments, this could result in net gains for plan sponsors, and lower funding and P&amp;L pain.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall that this 220 bps rate increase could be good news for pension sponsors, as liabilities would decrease 25-35% under such a scenario.  Depending on the nature of the plan investments, this could result in net gains for plan sponsors, and lower funding and P&#038;L pain.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill Coppedge</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7704</link> <dc:creator>Bill Coppedge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:26:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7704</guid> <description>Things to do: 1. Buy TBT;  2. When UST 10 is 5.5 sell TBT and buy TLT;  3. Rinse and repeat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things to do: 1. Buy TBT;  2. When UST 10 is 5.5 sell TBT and buy TLT;  3. Rinse and repeat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nittany222</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7226</link> <dc:creator>nittany222</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:15:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7226</guid> <description>Recall that this 220 bps rate increase could be good news for pension sponsors, as liabilities would decrease 25-35% under such a scenario.  Depending on the nature of the plan investments, this could result in net gains for plan sponsors, and lower funding and P&amp;L pain.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall that this 220 bps rate increase could be good news for pension sponsors, as liabilities would decrease 25-35% under such a scenario.  Depending on the nature of the plan investments, this could result in net gains for plan sponsors, and lower funding and P&#038;L pain.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill Coppedge</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7224</link> <dc:creator>Bill Coppedge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:26:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7224</guid> <description>Things to do: 1. Buy TBT;  2. When UST 10 is 5.5 sell TBT and buy TLT;  3. Rinse and repeat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things to do: 1. Buy TBT;  2. When UST 10 is 5.5 sell TBT and buy TLT;  3. Rinse and repeat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Pavese</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7215</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Pavese</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:09:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7215</guid> <description>I don&#039;t mind shops &quot;talking their book&quot; . . . but find humor in those that always seem to talk out of both sides of their mouth!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just read a very well written piece from Morgan Stanley&#039;s Henry McVey, Head of Global Macro &amp; Asset Allocation, which clearly expresses the firm&#039;s conviction in low-inflation, deflationary risks to global markets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;If so, we believe it might be in some investors’ interest to reconsider their tactical asset allocation strategies. Specifically, we would envision a reduction of overweight positions in risk assets—equities in particular—and a shift of fixed-income exposures away from credit and towards global sovereign bonds.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which one is it guys??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t mind shops &#8220;talking their book&#8221; . . . but find humor in those that always seem to talk out of both sides of their mouth!!</p><p>Just read a very well written piece from Morgan Stanley&#39;s Henry McVey, Head of Global Macro &#038; Asset Allocation, which clearly expresses the firm&#39;s conviction in low-inflation, deflationary risks to global markets.</p><p>&#8220;If so, we believe it might be in some investors’ interest to reconsider their tactical asset allocation strategies. Specifically, we would envision a reduction of overweight positions in risk assets—equities in particular—and a shift of fixed-income exposures away from credit and towards global sovereign bonds.&#8221;</p><p>Which one is it guys??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Edward Harrison</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7214</link> <dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7214</guid> <description>exactly!  I haven&#039;t seen their macro forecast, but 5.5% is death to both life insurers and the mortgage market.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly!  I haven&#39;t seen their macro forecast, but 5.5% is death to both life insurers and the mortgage market.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: haris07</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7213</link> <dc:creator>haris07</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-7213</guid> <description>Stupid investment banks don&#039;t realize that if the 10 year does rise to 5.5% or anywhere near that, the recession will be destined to become worse (double dip, near depression...whatever). The ONLY way to have a muddle through economy is to hope and pray that the deflation argument trumps or is enough to counter any inflation and that keeps yields in line. A 10 year at 5.5% will kill whatever little growth that the economy has by raising credit costs beyond anything that the economy can support. So, MS arguing that the ratesd will rise to 5.5% because economic growth will be high is sufficient in and of itself to kill that very growth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid investment banks don&#39;t realize that if the 10 year does rise to 5.5% or anywhere near that, the recession will be destined to become worse (double dip, near depression&#8230;whatever). The ONLY way to have a muddle through economy is to hope and pray that the deflation argument trumps or is enough to counter any inflation and that keeps yields in line. A 10 year at 5.5% will kill whatever little growth that the economy has by raising credit costs beyond anything that the economy can support. So, MS arguing that the ratesd will rise to 5.5% because economic growth will be high is sufficient in and of itself to kill that very growth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: images.creditwritedowns.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: ip-97-74-201-170.ip.secureserver.net @ 2010-02-09 19:03:16 -->