<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgan Stanley expects 10-year yields to rise 220 bps in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57653</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57653</guid>
		<description>Recall that this 220 bps rate increase could be good news for pension sponsors, as liabilities would decrease 25-35% under such a scenario.  Depending on the nature of the plan investments, this could result in net gains for plan sponsors, and lower funding and P&amp;L pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall that this 220 bps rate increase could be good news for pension sponsors, as liabilities would decrease 25-35% under such a scenario.  Depending on the nature of the plan investments, this could result in net gains for plan sponsors, and lower funding and P&amp;L pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Coppedge</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57651</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Coppedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57651</guid>
		<description>Things to do: 1. Buy TBT;  2. When UST 10 is 5.5 sell TBT and buy TLT;  3. Rinse and repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things to do: 1. Buy TBT;  2. When UST 10 is 5.5 sell TBT and buy TLT;  3. Rinse and repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Pavese</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57642</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Pavese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57642</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind shops &quot;talking their book&quot; . . . but find humor in those that always seem to talk out of both sides of their mouth!!

Just read a very well written piece from Morgan Stanley&#039;s Henry McVey, Head of Global Macro &amp; Asset Allocation, which clearly expresses the firm&#039;s conviction in low-inflation, deflationary risks to global markets.

&quot;If so, we believe it might be in some investors’ interest to reconsider their tactical asset allocation strategies. Specifically, we would envision a reduction of overweight positions in risk assets—equities in particular—and a shift of fixed-income exposures away from credit and towards global sovereign bonds.&quot;

Which one is it guys??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind shops &#8220;talking their book&#8221; . . . but find humor in those that always seem to talk out of both sides of their mouth!!</p>
<p>Just read a very well written piece from Morgan Stanley&#8217;s Henry McVey, Head of Global Macro &amp; Asset Allocation, which clearly expresses the firm&#8217;s conviction in low-inflation, deflationary risks to global markets.</p>
<p>&#8220;If so, we believe it might be in some investors’ interest to reconsider their tactical asset allocation strategies. Specifically, we would envision a reduction of overweight positions in risk assets—equities in particular—and a shift of fixed-income exposures away from credit and towards global sovereign bonds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which one is it guys??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57641</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57641</guid>
		<description>exactly!  I haven&#039;t seen their macro forecast, but 5.5% is death to both life insurers and the mortgage market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly!  I haven&#8217;t seen their macro forecast, but 5.5% is death to both life insurers and the mortgage market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haris07</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57640</link>
		<dc:creator>haris07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html#comment-57640</guid>
		<description>Stupid investment banks don&#039;t realize that if the 10 year does rise to 5.5% or anywhere near that, the recession will be destined to become worse (double dip, near depression...whatever). The ONLY way to have a muddle through economy is to hope and pray that the deflation argument trumps or is enough to counter any inflation and that keeps yields in line. A 10 year at 5.5% will kill whatever little growth that the economy has by raising credit costs beyond anything that the economy can support. So, MS arguing that the ratesd will rise to 5.5% because economic growth will be high is sufficient in and of itself to kill that very growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid investment banks don&#8217;t realize that if the 10 year does rise to 5.5% or anywhere near that, the recession will be destined to become worse (double dip, near depression&#8230;whatever). The ONLY way to have a muddle through economy is to hope and pray that the deflation argument trumps or is enough to counter any inflation and that keeps yields in line. A 10 year at 5.5% will kill whatever little growth that the economy has by raising credit costs beyond anything that the economy can support. So, MS arguing that the ratesd will rise to 5.5% because economic growth will be high is sufficient in and of itself to kill that very growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html/feed ) in 0.13590 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 4:25 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 5:25 pm UTC -->
