<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case of the dissident Chrysler bondholders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/05/the-case-of-the-dissident-chrysler-bondholders.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/05/the-case-of-the-dissident-chrysler-bondholders.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: rfreud</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/05/the-case-of-the-dissident-chrysler-bondholders.html#comment-56333</link>
		<dc:creator>rfreud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=8385#comment-56333</guid>
		<description>A 363 sale is an auction, a like a foreclosure sale. If the class of senior bondholders or rather a minority of them believes it can recover more in a liquidation than from a sale to the stalking horse bidder in a 363 sale, well then, they should overbid the FIAT-UAW-UST offer and get on with it. Their problem will be lining up the financing to pay for their bid. The US Treasury is the only game in town for that. 

A more serious and interesting question in all this is: What democratic process validates the UST decision to finance the FIAT-UAW combination?  And also, is this kind of lending what the government rather than a bank, even a national or nationalized bank, ought to be doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 363 sale is an auction, a like a foreclosure sale. If the class of senior bondholders or rather a minority of them believes it can recover more in a liquidation than from a sale to the stalking horse bidder in a 363 sale, well then, they should overbid the FIAT-UAW-UST offer and get on with it. Their problem will be lining up the financing to pay for their bid. The US Treasury is the only game in town for that. </p>
<p>A more serious and interesting question in all this is: What democratic process validates the UST decision to finance the FIAT-UAW combination?  And also, is this kind of lending what the government rather than a bank, even a national or nationalized bank, ought to be doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/05/the-case-of-the-dissident-chrysler-bondholders.html/feed ) in 0.12325 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:36 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:36 am UTC -->
