<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: GM offers a debt for equity swap to bondholders</title> <atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/gm-offers-a-debt-for-equity-swap-to-bondholders.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/gm-offers-a-debt-for-equity-swap-to-bondholders.html</link> <description>a finance news and opinion site</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Edward Harrison</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/gm-offers-a-debt-for-equity-swap-to-bondholders.html#comment-8130</link> <dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:38:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=8137#comment-8130</guid> <description>@CreditTrader, that is interesting.  What about its being voluntary makes it questionable?  Of course that leaves some to game the system like PIMCO did in the GMAC deal. I would imagine it would be a default if the exchange were an involuntary swap.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CreditTrader, that is interesting.  What about its being voluntary makes it questionable?  Of course that leaves some to game the system like PIMCO did in the GMAC deal. I would imagine it would be a default if the exchange were an involuntary swap.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Edward Harrison</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/gm-offers-a-debt-for-equity-swap-to-bondholders.html#comment-4864</link> <dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:38:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=8137#comment-4864</guid> <description>@CreditTrader, that is interesting.  What about its being voluntary makes it questionable?  Of course that leaves some to game the system like PIMCO did in the GMAC deal. I would imagine it would be a default if the exchange were an involuntary swap.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CreditTrader, that is interesting.  What about its being voluntary makes it questionable?  Of course that leaves some to game the system like PIMCO did in the GMAC deal. I would imagine it would be a default if the exchange were an involuntary swap.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CreditTrader</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/gm-offers-a-debt-for-equity-swap-to-bondholders.html#comment-4853</link> <dc:creator>CreditTrader</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:56:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=8137#comment-4853</guid> <description>Hey Ed, the &#039;voluntary&#039; nature of the exchange does indeed make it uncertain as to whether CDS will be triggered (think RESCAP last year) and we note that 5Y GM is 4pts better today at 84/86% upfront...They only have $2.7bn outstanding which interestingly is around 10% of the notional bonds outstanding.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ed, the &#39;voluntary&#39; nature of the exchange does indeed make it uncertain as to whether CDS will be triggered (think RESCAP last year) and we note that 5Y GM is 4pts better today at 84/86% upfront&#8230;They only have $2.7bn outstanding which interestingly is around 10% of the notional bonds outstanding.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CreditTrader</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/04/gm-offers-a-debt-for-equity-swap-to-bondholders.html#comment-4840</link> <dc:creator>CreditTrader</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:56:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=8137#comment-4840</guid> <description>Hey Ed, the &#039;voluntary&#039; nature of the exchange does indeed make it uncertain as to whether CDS will be triggered (think RESCAP last year) and we note that 5Y GM is 4pts better today at 84/86% upfront...They only have $2.7bn outstanding which interestingly is around 10% of the notional bonds outstanding.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ed, the &#39;voluntary&#39; nature of the exchange does indeed make it uncertain as to whether CDS will be triggered (think RESCAP last year) and we note that 5Y GM is 4pts better today at 84/86% upfront&#8230;They only have $2.7bn outstanding which interestingly is around 10% of the notional bonds outstanding.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: images.creditwritedowns.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.creditwritedowns.com @ 2010-03-21 12:40:58 -->