<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glencore: credit default swaps suggest something amiss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/12/glencore-credit-default-swaps-suggest-something-amiss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/12/glencore-credit-default-swaps-suggest-something-amiss.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/12/glencore-credit-default-swaps-suggest-something-amiss.html#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=2606#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>Definitely, I would agree.  I mentioned this on another post, but the word on the street is that Glencore has a huge long position in WTI forward contracts and that explains the huge differential that has opened between WTI and Brent crude.  As I right this WTI has plummeted to 33 while Brent is still at $44.  Something is definitely wrong there.  Whether its Glencore or something else, but this can&#039;t go on much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely, I would agree.  I mentioned this on another post, but the word on the street is that Glencore has a huge long position in WTI forward contracts and that explains the huge differential that has opened between WTI and Brent crude.  As I right this WTI has plummeted to 33 while Brent is still at $44.  Something is definitely wrong there.  Whether its Glencore or something else, but this can&#8217;t go on much longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT in San Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/12/glencore-credit-default-swaps-suggest-something-amiss.html#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>AT in San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=2606#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>And that doesn&#039;t even mention Glencore&#039;s 70% stake in Australia&#039;s Minara Resources, now trading at a whopping 29 cents a share. And on Wednesday Glencore announced the merger of certain Credit-Suisse trading businesses into the Glencore machine. Something is rotten in Switzerland...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that doesn&#8217;t even mention Glencore&#8217;s 70% stake in Australia&#8217;s Minara Resources, now trading at a whopping 29 cents a share. And on Wednesday Glencore announced the merger of certain Credit-Suisse trading businesses into the Glencore machine. Something is rotten in Switzerland&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/12/glencore-credit-default-swaps-suggest-something-amiss.html/feed ) in 0.12087 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:45 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:45 am UTC -->
