<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irish banks have unreported bad debt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/07/irish-banks-have-unreported-bad-debt.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/07/irish-banks-have-unreported-bad-debt.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: BenGraham</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/07/irish-banks-have-unreported-bad-debt.html#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>BenGraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/07/irish-banks-have-unreported-bad-debt.html#comment-118</guid>
		<description>In sum: you take what the banks have lost in terms of market cap, some 41bn, and you equal it to the amount of bad debt you assume is sitting on their books? Try this, for instance: in the last year H&amp;M, one of the best retailers in the world, has lost in terms of market cap some 10bn euro. Now, reasoning the same way, should we expect, who knows, H&amp;M to see a 10bn drop in its revenues? or maybe in its profits? But since its net income last year was 1/5 of 10bn, maybe we should expect it to lose 8bn this year, and the likes..... This is not about the Irish banks or their financial health, this is about journalism. I have no comment: I just think that 90% of the press should go back to school and learn at least the A,B,C not of finance (there&#039;s no hope on that side), but of common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In sum: you take what the banks have lost in terms of market cap, some 41bn, and you equal it to the amount of bad debt you assume is sitting on their books? Try this, for instance: in the last year H&amp;M, one of the best retailers in the world, has lost in terms of market cap some 10bn euro. Now, reasoning the same way, should we expect, who knows, H&amp;M to see a 10bn drop in its revenues? or maybe in its profits? But since its net income last year was 1/5 of 10bn, maybe we should expect it to lose 8bn this year, and the likes&#8230;.. This is not about the Irish banks or their financial health, this is about journalism. I have no comment: I just think that 90% of the press should go back to school and learn at least the A,B,C not of finance (there&#39;s no hope on that side), but of common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/07/irish-banks-have-unreported-bad-debt.html/feed ) in 0.12277 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 2:05 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 3:05 am UTC -->
