<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPI understates inflation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Eric,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hedonic regression decreases the measurement of inflation because it says that the actual price does not incorporate all of the value one receives from an item.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Government statisticians are looking be looking to measure the effective price including all non-price improvements.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For example, if I bought a car for $11,000 that sold for $10,000 last year the price change is 10%.  However, I may enjoy technological and safety feature improvements over the equivalent vehicle from last year (say I got side air bags for no extra cost).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What the government then does is adjust the 10% change down to reflect the fact this hidden value.  This would be as if I bought the car for $10,700, say.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s the same concept as when a homebuilder selling a house to you keeps the actual price of the house the same but throws in closing costs or some other goodie. That makes the &lt;b&gt;effective&lt;/b&gt; price to you lower.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Edward</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Hedonic regression decreases the measurement of inflation because it says that the actual price does not incorporate all of the value one receives from an item.</p>
<p>Government statisticians are looking be looking to measure the effective price including all non-price improvements.</p>
<p>For example, if I bought a car for $11,000 that sold for $10,000 last year the price change is 10%.  However, I may enjoy technological and safety feature improvements over the equivalent vehicle from last year (say I got side air bags for no extra cost).</p>
<p>What the government then does is adjust the 10% change down to reflect the fact this hidden value.  This would be as if I bought the car for $10,700, say.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same concept as when a homebuilder selling a house to you keeps the actual price of the house the same but throws in closing costs or some other goodie. That makes the <b>effective</b> price to you lower.</p>
<p>Edward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-302</guid>
		<description>As described, hedonic regression should increase, not decrease, measurement of inflation. As you say, the theoretical price of a 2008 computer would be adjusted *upward* to account for it&#039;s improved capabilities, which would increase calculated inflation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As described, hedonic regression should increase, not decrease, measurement of inflation. As you say, the theoretical price of a 2008 computer would be adjusted *upward* to account for it&#8217;s improved capabilities, which would increase calculated inflation.</p>
<p>Not so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-76</guid>
		<description>&quot;GC said...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;    Real GDP uses the GDP deflator; not the CPI&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That&#039;s a given.  Why are you commenting on it.  If you want to see how different the two are, go to this post here:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/05/revised-gdp-number-pure-fiction.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;GC said&#8230;</p>
<p>    Real GDP uses the GDP deflator; not the CPI&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a given.  Why are you commenting on it.  If you want to see how different the two are, go to this post here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/05/revised-gdp-number-pure-fiction.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/05/revised-gdp-number-pure-fiction.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GC</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>GC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Real GDP uses the GDP deflator; not the CPI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real GDP uses the GDP deflator; not the CPI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/cpi-understates-inflation.html/feed ) in 0.13359 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:13 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:13 am UTC -->
