You are here: Political Economy » The Difficult Part of US Fiscal Negotiations Is Still Ahead
The explosive market rally following the fiscal cliff agreement was based more on what didn’t happen than what did. What didn’t happen was the implementation of automatic tax increases and spending cuts that would have shaved about 5% off GDP and cause a recession. What did happen was an agreement that would still reduce GDP by about 1.5%, an amount that still looms as significant in light of an economy that is only slogging along at a growth rate of about 2%. Even more important is the potential mess that lies ahead. The Treasury Department’s extraordinary measures to extend the debt ceiling runs out at the end of February or the beginning of March. The sequester requiring automatic across-the-board spending cuts of $110 billion for 2013 goes into effect on March 1st. The federal government’s spending authority for the current budget expires on March 27th.
The combination of the debt limit, the sequester and the government’s spending authority, all expiring within a short period promises to make the turmoil over the August 2011 debt limit fight look like a day at the beach in comparison—–and that fight led to a U.S. credit downgrade and a near default on paying federal obligations on time. Already, the Republican congressional leadership has declared its intention of using the debt limit to press for significant spending cuts, even at the risk of another credit downgrade and the shutting down of the federal government. Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania said “We Republicans need to be willing to tolerate a temporary partial government shutdown.”
President Obama, on the other hand, has drawn a line in the sand, saying that he would not negotiate the debt limit and would not allow the issue to be continually used as a weapon to slash spending. He stated that Congress has already passed the legislation authorizing the spending and should not renege on paying the bills. As in August 2011, this could lead to another period of brinksmanship and uncertainty about the possibility of a U.S. default and credit downgrade combined with a government shutdown.
Going into the fiscal cliff negotiations, Obama had the upper hand as doing nothing would have triggered big automatic tax increases that Republicans abhorred. Now, with that out of the way, the Republican leadership feels that they have a lot more leverage in the upcoming round of negotiations. We therefore could be headed for an acute crisis that would dwarf anything we’ve seen in recent years.
Not much is likely to happen immediately ahead. The president’s inauguration is on January 21st, with the State of the Union speech following in late January or early February and the budget presentation by February 4th. After that we expect things to heat up, although the stock market concern is likely to emerge long before.
The market exploded to the upside following the fiscal cliff settlement based on what didn’t happen. However, the agreement was limited in scope and most of the hard work lies ahead. We are now facing a period of severe infighting between two opposing parties, both of which believe they have the leverage to get their way. We are likely facing a period of accusations, name-calling, acrimony, brinksmanship, uncertainty and threats to the credit standing of the U.S. Furthermore, any plan that does emerge from the controversy will necessarily include more spending cuts and tax increases and an even further hit to economic growth. In this atmosphere, we think the market rally will fade within days and that a major down move is probable.
About Comstock Partners
Comstock Partners, Inc. analyzes economic and financial conditions from a long-term macro-economic perspective and makes adjustments based on cyclical and shorter-term considerations. In pursuit of its goals, the firm invests in various asset classes including domestic and foreign stocks, bonds, currencies and derivatives including indices and options. For the Capital Value Fund, Comstock Partners can buy or sell short and make use of leverage in order to maximize returns under various market conditions. In effect, we believe our operation resembles a modern-day hedge fund in its scope of activities.
Like us on Facebook
Follow Edward on Twitter
- AIIB Prelude to SDR Decision
- Repeat after me: sectoral balances must sum to zero
- Greek default
- Front-running the Fed on interest rate hikes
- Currency wars, the Swiss franc, policy divergence and Fed rate hikes
- Wolfgang Schaeuble the Salesman
- Five Investing Themes That Need Further Examination
- Why Understanding Money Matters in Greece
- Albert Edwards on China
- When do we decide that Europe must restructure much of its debt?
- How to look at the Greece bailout deal
- Negotiating strategies and political constraints regarding Greece
- A decision-tree framework for thinking about the Greek – Troika negotiations
- Tax Anticipation Notes: A Timely Alternative Financing Instrument for Greece
- Syriza and the French indemnity of 1871-73
- Gauging the financial crisis end game
- Why quantitative easing and negative interest rates will fail
- Pie in the Sky
- Yanis Varoufakis on fiscal waterboarding and Ponzi austerity
- The convergence of safe asset yields toward zero
-  Raoul Pal: The Fed against the world means serious market and economic volatility
- Daniel Alpert on the Euro and QE
- Evan Engstrom on net neutrality
- Mark Weisbrot on Europe
- Steve Hanke on China and Greece
-  The strong dollar and the very bad Austrian bank
-  Boom Bust, Fed edition
-  Celente: “Greece should have never been in the euro”
-  Boom Bust, Fed Edition (Part II)
- Andrea Terzi on inflation and QE