The current housing bust is much worse than the Great Depression
Great chart from the recently released Economic Report of the President. We suspect the Great Depression housing bust didn’t have the government props to soften the blow as we do today, which, therefore, on a relative basis, makes the current bust much worse. The prior conditions to the current bust must have been much worse than those before the Great Depression.
If not for the decisive action of Paulson, Bernanke, Geithner and Co. we all may have become farmers living under the freeway. Can’t prove counterfactuals, but that is what we believe. So give them an A+ for stabilization. Structural adjustment and long-term reform is an entirely different story, however.
We heard Meredith Whitney say this morning that 95 percent of current mortgages are backed, effectively, by the taxpayer,
…95-plus percent of mortgages today are being backed by Fannie and Freddie. Fannie and Freddie are effectively subsidizing unprofitable mortgages that the banks wouldn’t put on their balance sheet. That’s not sustainable and ultimately the taxpayer is paying the bill for it. The banks used to price profitable loans and you know, they’re a myriad of loan products that they’re still not pricing for profits.
Basic microeconomics tells us that government repression of prices creates supply shortages. Think back to the rent control supply and demand graphs in Econ 101, which we have modified in the chart below.
This is one of the reason why we believe housing is so slow to recover. Who in their right mind x/ the Govie would lend long-term money at a rate lower or close to the current inflation rate? Rational lenders also take into account the massive monetization that is currently taking place globally and its impact on future inflation in calculating their expected real returns.
Your Econ 101 rent control-like graph has made me think for a while. However, I don’t believe it’s a right depiction of the credit market. I’d say that low rates are the effect of cheap funding for credit institutions rather than a legal cap on rates, which is what the graph shows. In other words, low rates are the effect of pushing the supply down to the right, or a lowering of the marginal cost of credit as a result of the Fed’s cheap funding.
Thanks.
Ed, Ed, Ed. When did you become a neoclassical economist? You should know better than to use those IS/LM equilibrium models.
This isn’t my post.
The graph for current house prices might still have much further to fall before finding the real floor. The price from peak to trough hides the real extent of the bubble. If the economy were to get back to a sensible level it would mean house prices have another 20%+ further to fall. That will leave Fannie and Freddie insolvent again. All the efforts to boost house prices will fail because there are no efforts to boost wages and incomes which are the real support for real estate prices. Ignoring that fact does not mean that the crisis is over.