Credit Writedowns » Economics

What is this “Financial Instability Hypothesis” by Hyman Minsky really about?

Randall Wray — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:57:37 +0000

In his publications in the 1950s through the mid 1960s, Minsky gradually developed his analysis of the cycles. First, he argued that institutions, and in particular financial institutions, matter. This was a reaction against the growing dominance of a particular version of Keynesian economics best represented in the ISLM model. At the same time, he examined financial innovation, arguing that normal profit seeking by financial institutions continually subverted attempts by the authorities to constrain money supply growth. This is one of the main reasons why he rejected the LM curve’s presumption of a fixed money supply. With his 1975 book, Minsky provided an alternative analysis of Keynes’s theory. This provides his most detailed presentation of the “financial theory of investment and investment theory of the cycle”. Minsky continually developed his financial instability hypothesis to incorporate the extensions made to his investment theory over the course of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. The Kalecki equation was added; the two-price system was incorporated; and a more complex treatment of sectoral balances was included. Minsky also continued to improve his approach to banks, recognizing the futility of Fed attempts to control the money supply

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
What is this “Financial Instability Hypothesis” by Hyman Minsky really about? originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

Keen: Instability in Financial Markets 15 Apr 2012
James Galbraith: How financial stability creates instability 1 Dec 2009
Minsky: Turning neoclassical economics on its head 21 Jul 2009

Minskian Perspective on Instability in Financial Markets

Steve Keen — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:44:52 +0000

Yesterday, we highlighted the talk that Steve Keen gave at the INET conference as our only post. Today, we present the full and in-depth version including his written analysis via Steve Keen's DebtWatch website. Steve ends with two innovative solutions to this and future debt crises

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Minskian Perspective on Instability in Financial Markets originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

Keen: Instability in Financial Markets 15 Apr 2012
James Galbraith: How financial stability creates instability 1 Dec 2009

Keen: Instability in Financial Markets

Edward Harrison — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:54:49 +0000

Steve Keen's talk at INET is now up on the web (hat tip BT). His talk is billed as a primer on Hyman Minsky. In it, Steve argues that one cannot model Minsky using a New Keynesian or traditional neoclassical approach because of the reliance of these modelling approaches on the economic equilibrium assumption. Keen sees this assumption as the major flaw that cannot be remedied using standard modelling approaches

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Keen: Instability in Financial Markets originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

James Galbraith: How financial stability creates instability 1 Dec 2009
Steve Keen and the spectre of terminal debt 15 Sep 2009

Video: Steve Keen on modelling and the Krugman debate

Edward Harrison — Thu, 05 Apr 2012 02:00:09 +0000

I think this video is worth watching because Keen gets to the heart of the issues with the standard approach to economics. He says that banks, money and debt are front and center in reality as we now see after the crisis. Consequently, they should also be integral in economic models

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Video: Steve Keen on modelling and the Krugman debate originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

Steve Keen on the Australian economy and housing bubbles in Australia, Canada, UK and Hong Kong 13 Mar 2012
Steve Keen on HARDtalk on the financial crisis and the economy 27 Nov 2011
Steve Keen: On the Edge with Max Keiser 21 Sep 2009

Alan Blinder gets it

Edward Harrison — Thu, 05 Apr 2012 01:15:42 +0000

I caught this statement from Alan Blinder in a debate on the New York Times about teaching economics. Clearly, Blinder sees a huge financial crisis and reflexively understands changes must be made

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Alan Blinder gets it originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

A conversation about the growing fiscal deficit on Charlie Rose 12 Jun 2009
It’s the debt, stupid 23 Sep 2009

Progress on the monetary policy and banking debate

Edward Harrison — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 02:00:28 +0000

We seem to be moving forward with this discussion on monetary policy, banking, and reserves. John Carney does a good job of summarising some of the initial forays in this back and forth. I am going to try my hand at framing the discussion here using my own analysis of the comments iteratively, with the assistance of more comments of course. Where there are mistakes, I will fix them accordingly

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Progress on the monetary policy and banking debate originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

Chart of the Day: Monetary Transmission Mechanisms 8 Mar 2012
Credible lenders of last resort use price, not quantity signals 6 Nov 2011
Endogenous or exogenous money? 3 Apr 2012

Endogenous or exogenous money?

Edward Harrison — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:49:51 +0000

I think the real difference between what Nick Rowe is saying and what people like Scott Fullwiler and Steve are saying is that Nick believes over the medium-term, central bank interest rate policy is endogenous. What I think Nick means is that Scott Fullwiler's view is reasonably clear and straightforward but that it only matters over a short-term time horizon because central bank interest rate policy adjusts endogenously over the medium-term to commercial bank and other economic variables such that it is really endogenous rather than exogenous

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Endogenous or exogenous money? originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

Credible lenders of last resort use price, not quantity signals 6 Nov 2011
Norway makes three 28 Oct 2009
Chart of the Day: Monetary Transmission Mechanisms 8 Mar 2012

Krugman’s Flashing Neon Sign

Guest Author — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:26:39 +0000

The debate between Paul Krugman and my friend Steve Keen regarding how banks work (see here, here, here, and here) has caused me to revisit an old quote. Back in the 1990s I would use Krugman’s book, Peddling Prosperity (1995), in my intermediate macroeconomics courses since it provides a good overview of what were then contemporary debates in macroeconomic theory as well as Krugman’s criticisms of various popular views on macroeconomic policy issues from that era. One passage near the very end of the book has always remained in the back of my mind; in it, Krugman critiques a popular view that was and still is highly influential regarding productivity and trade policy. He writes: “So, if you hear someone say something along the lines of ‘America needs higher productivity so that it can compete in today’s global economy,’ never mind who he is or how plausible he sounds. He might as well be wearing a flashing neon sign that reads: ‘I DON’T KNOW WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT.’” (p. 280; emphasis in original) In his latest post in this debate (which Keen replied to here), Krugman demonstrates that he has a very good grasp of banking as it is presented in a traditional money and banking textbook. Unfortunately for him, though, there’s virtually nothing in that description of banking that is actually correct. Instead of a persuasive defense of his own views on banking, his post is in essence his own flashing neon sign where he provides undisputable evidence that “I don’t know what I’m talking about.”

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Krugman’s Flashing Neon Sign originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

Does the Money Multiplier Exist? 12 Aug 2010
On debt monetization 23 Nov 2009
Chart of the Day: Excess Reserves 6 Apr 2011

Ptolemaic Economics in the Age of Einstein

Steve Keen — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 18:49:32 +0000

Paul Krugman’s claim that those who argue banks play an essential role in macroeconomics are “Banking Mystics” has a natural riposte: Neoclassical economists like Krugman who believe that capitalism can be modelled without either money or banks are Barter Mystics (David Graeber, 2011). How on earth can someone believe that the manifest reality that transactions involve money being exchanged for goods can be ignored, and pretend instead that goods are exchanged for goods? How on earth can the institutional reality of banks be ignored by those who claim to be macroeconomists

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Ptolemaic Economics in the Age of Einstein originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts No related posts.

Ludwig von Mises on Austrian Business Cycle Theory

Edward Harrison — Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:36:15 +0000

Yesterday, John Carney at CNBC had a nice little post comparing Hyman Minsky's Financial Instability Hypothesis with some of the thinking by Friedrich von Hayek behind Austrian Business Cycle Theory. John rightly points to this passage as "a theory about banking as an endogenous destabilizer of the economy." And this certainly fits with the Minsky view of the world. von Mises takes the view that it is in having "bank notes without gold backing or current accounts which are not entirely backed by gold reserves, the banks are in a position to expand credit considerably". Nevertheless, whether you believe the genesis of the credit expansion is Federal Reserve interest rate policy, animal spirits, fiat currency or fractional-reserve banking, what should be clear is that it is the lower rate of interest that creates the credit growth. The question is whether this lowering of rates is beneficial over the long-term. Vom Mises argues it is not

Credit Writedowns Pro is live. Sign up today for premium content.
Ludwig von Mises on Austrian Business Cycle Theory originally appeared on Credit Writedowns

Links: RSS - Daily - Weekly - Twitter - Facebook - Contact
Credit Writedowns Feed # abf0d081857b85fe6be494728740a4f1

Related Posts

The Economy’s Vicious Cycle for Michigan Banks and Business 14 Mar 2010
What does Mises say about trying to stimulate the economy out of recession 11 Dec 2008