<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seasonally-adjusted claims below 500,000 for third week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57743</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57743</guid>
		<description>Brick, the seasonal-adjustment factors are set far in advance as I have said before. The discrepancy has a lot to do with the size of layoffs.  That number is divided by the factor and multiplied by 100.  So the larger the layoff, the larger the discrepancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brick, the seasonal-adjustment factors are set far in advance as I have said before. The discrepancy has a lot to do with the size of layoffs.  That number is divided by the factor and multiplied by 100.  So the larger the layoff, the larger the discrepancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brick</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57742</link>
		<dc:creator>Brick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57742</guid>
		<description> Seasonal adjustment for the same week last year was roughly 200,000 this year it is about 190,000. This compares to seasonal adjustments in the range 120,000 to 140,000 for 2003-2007 in the same week. You should expect 6 days worth of claims in the week and some lay offs in retail which I would have estimated to put the seasonal adjustment at around 150,000 maximum. I have an uneasy feeling about this seasonal adjustment number for the week. I also have a feeling that short working weeks may be playing havoc with initial claims numbers, shifting from week to week and delaying claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seasonal adjustment for the same week last year was roughly 200,000 this year it is about 190,000. This compares to seasonal adjustments in the range 120,000 to 140,000 for 2003-2007 in the same week. You should expect 6 days worth of claims in the week and some lay offs in retail which I would have estimated to put the seasonal adjustment at around 150,000 maximum. I have an uneasy feeling about this seasonal adjustment number for the week. I also have a feeling that short working weeks may be playing havoc with initial claims numbers, shifting from week to week and delaying claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57737</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57737</guid>
		<description>Barry, I also updated the post to reflect the data on those on extended benefits - now at 10 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry, I also updated the post to reflect the data on those on extended benefits &#8211; now at 10 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57733</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57733</guid>
		<description>You can track U-6 as a comprehensive measure of unemployment. It is now 17.2%. David Rosenberg believes the unusually large gap between the two cannot close by having U-6 fall.  The base rate of unemployment must also rise to see a reversion to mean.  That&#039;s why he sees unemployment much higher.  We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can track U-6 as a comprehensive measure of unemployment. It is now 17.2%. David Rosenberg believes the unusually large gap between the two cannot close by having U-6 fall.  The base rate of unemployment must also rise to see a reversion to mean.  That&#8217;s why he sees unemployment much higher.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barryschaeffer</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57732</link>
		<dc:creator>barryschaeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html#comment-57732</guid>
		<description>Edward,

What has been the trend with the numbers of discouraged workers who are no longer tracked by the Labor Dept (i.e. those who fall off the roles)?  I would think that this would be a critical parameter to follow.

Barry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward,</p>
<p>What has been the trend with the numbers of discouraged workers who are no longer tracked by the Labor Dept (i.e. those who fall off the roles)?  I would think that this would be a critical parameter to follow.</p>
<p>Barry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/12/seasonally-adjusted-claims-below-500000-for-third-week.html/feed ) in 0.12662 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:55 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:55 am UTC -->
