<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third quarter growth now 2.8%, much lower than original estimate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/third-quarter-growth-now-2-8-much-lower-than-original-estimate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/third-quarter-growth-now-2-8-much-lower-than-original-estimate.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/third-quarter-growth-now-2-8-much-lower-than-original-estimate.html#comment-57669</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/third-quarter-growth-now-2-8-much-lower-than-original-estimate.html#comment-57669</guid>
		<description>I like that term &#039;technical recovery.&#039;  I want it to gain more traction as a way of thinking about things because what Krugman says is right.

Here&#039;s what I wrote about it in July:
http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/technical-recovery-wont-feel-like-a-recovery-to-most.html

I didn&#039;t coin the phrase, but I do want to coin the concept that the economy is not in an actual recovery until it reaches the level of GDP it attained before the recession began. Until then, it is merely in a technical recovery.

Maybe this will help people psychologically if the terms fit the reality better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that term &#8216;technical recovery.&#8217;  I want it to gain more traction as a way of thinking about things because what Krugman says is right.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I wrote about it in July:<br />
<a href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/technical-recovery-wont-feel-like-a-recovery-to-most.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/technical-recovery-wont-feel-like-a-recovery-to-most.html</a></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t coin the phrase, but I do want to coin the concept that the economy is not in an actual recovery until it reaches the level of GDP it attained before the recession began. Until then, it is merely in a technical recovery.</p>
<p>Maybe this will help people psychologically if the terms fit the reality better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/third-quarter-growth-now-2-8-much-lower-than-original-estimate.html#comment-57667</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/third-quarter-growth-now-2-8-much-lower-than-original-estimate.html#comment-57667</guid>
		<description>According to Paul Krugman: the original growth rate, assuming it was maintained, would have brought full employment during Sarah Palin&#039;s second term....with this growth rate it will never happen.   &quot; We may be in a technical recovery, but we’re not recovering.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Paul Krugman: the original growth rate, assuming it was maintained, would have brought full employment during Sarah Palin&#8217;s second term&#8230;.with this growth rate it will never happen.   &#8221; We may be in a technical recovery, but we’re not recovering.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/third-quarter-growth-now-2-8-much-lower-than-original-estimate.html/feed ) in 0.12379 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:29 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:29 am UTC -->
