<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China cuts holding of U.S. Treasury securities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56883</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56883</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ed.

Given that the treasury yield is so low, if Yuan is going to appreciate, then the first thing china going to do is to sell all their treasury to the market or to the Fed.   

3% appreciation in yuan implied they get virtually nothing (not accounting for all the transaction fees).   

There is an article from Michael Pettis two days ago.  And it may worth to read, Ed.

http://mpettis.com/2009/08/yet-another-discussion-on-the-asian-savings-glut-hypothesis-and-why-it-matters/

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ed.</p>
<p>Given that the treasury yield is so low, if Yuan is going to appreciate, then the first thing china going to do is to sell all their treasury to the market or to the Fed.   </p>
<p>3% appreciation in yuan implied they get virtually nothing (not accounting for all the transaction fees).   </p>
<p>There is an article from Michael Pettis two days ago.  And it may worth to read, Ed.</p>
<p><a href="http://mpettis.com/2009/08/yet-another-discussion-on-the-asian-savings-glut-hypothesis-and-why-it-matters/" rel="nofollow">http://mpettis.com/2009/08/yet-another-discussion-on-the-asian-savings-glut-hypothesis-and-why-it-matters/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hbl</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56878</link>
		<dc:creator>hbl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56878</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;But, as you have probably noticed, interest rates have not increased appreciably.  What gives?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Hi Ed,

I&#039;m a bit of a broken record, but I think one of the biggest reasons is that private borrowing has been contracting faster than public borrowing has been expanding, so treasuries end up replacing other disappearing assets on many balance sheets:

http://www.thoughtofferings.com/2009/08/why-treasuries-find-buyers-and-interest.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;But, as you have probably noticed, interest rates have not increased appreciably.  What gives?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit of a broken record, but I think one of the biggest reasons is that private borrowing has been contracting faster than public borrowing has been expanding, so treasuries end up replacing other disappearing assets on many balance sheets:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thoughtofferings.com/2009/08/why-treasuries-find-buyers-and-interest.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thoughtofferings.com/2009/08/why-treasuries-find-buyers-and-interest.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Lagavulin</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56870</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Lagavulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56870</guid>
		<description>Actually, the biggest factor keeping interest rates in check is that the US has become the prime buyer of its own securities.  There&#039;s been speculation on this for over a year now, and the Fed is finally owning up to it publicly.

There&#039;s nothing shady about the practice, it&#039;s done all the time to roll over maturities and such, but the sheer volume of transactions, as well as the (very shady) suspicions as to how much buying in the last year was flooding in from unnamed off-shore sources like the Cayman Islands, lends credence to the belief that the Fed isn&#039;t just trying to create stability but more likely is acting like a credit card junkie, shuffling the debt from one account to another in order to stave-off the collectors as long as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the biggest factor keeping interest rates in check is that the US has become the prime buyer of its own securities.  There&#8217;s been speculation on this for over a year now, and the Fed is finally owning up to it publicly.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing shady about the practice, it&#8217;s done all the time to roll over maturities and such, but the sheer volume of transactions, as well as the (very shady) suspicions as to how much buying in the last year was flooding in from unnamed off-shore sources like the Cayman Islands, lends credence to the belief that the Fed isn&#8217;t just trying to create stability but more likely is acting like a credit card junkie, shuffling the debt from one account to another in order to stave-off the collectors as long as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56865</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56865</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t link to that one but I agree they are trying their best to diversify away from U.S. dollar financial assets.  The truth is there are few ways to do so given how much surplus they are accumulating.  Obviously, if they really wanted to avoid this problem, they would let their currency appreciate.

In many ways, their dollar problem is one of their own making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t link to that one but I agree they are trying their best to diversify away from U.S. dollar financial assets.  The truth is there are few ways to do so given how much surplus they are accumulating.  Obviously, if they really wanted to avoid this problem, they would let their currency appreciate.</p>
<p>In many ways, their dollar problem is one of their own making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56864</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56864</guid>
		<description>Your point is semantics.  Net sales is all that matters in regards to the debate on Chinese holdings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point is semantics.  Net sales is all that matters in regards to the debate on Chinese holdings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56860</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56860</guid>
		<description>not sure if you have linked the news that china has made a $41Billion contact with Australia in Natural gas.  

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/08/18/2659831.htm

It seems the Chinese are really serious about diversifying their reserves.

Man
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure if you have linked the news that china has made a $41Billion contact with Australia in Natural gas.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/08/18/2659831.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/08/18/2659831.htm</a></p>
<p>It seems the Chinese are really serious about diversifying their reserves.</p>
<p>Man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56859</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56859</guid>
		<description>Since the beginning of the year, we&#039;ve seen a slow but steady rise in the interest rates of US Treasurys. In June, there was actually a fairly quick rise, and then a sell off as the rates regressed to the mean - but the mean is an upward sloping curve.  See here: http://stockcharts.com/charts/performance/USBonds.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the beginning of the year, we&#8217;ve seen a slow but steady rise in the interest rates of US Treasurys. In June, there was actually a fairly quick rise, and then a sell off as the rates regressed to the mean &#8211; but the mean is an upward sloping curve.  See here: <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/performance/USBonds.html" rel="nofollow">http://stockcharts.com/charts/performance/USBonds.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56856</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html#comment-56856</guid>
		<description>China&#039;s reduced dollar amount of U.S. Treasury securities DOES NOT mean they&#039;re selling, not necessarily. It could simply mean they&#039;re not renewing expiring notes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China&#8217;s reduced dollar amount of U.S. Treasury securities DOES NOT mean they&#8217;re selling, not necessarily. It could simply mean they&#8217;re not renewing expiring notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/08/china-cuts-holding-of-u-s-treasury-securities.html/feed ) in 0.13886 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:30 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:30 am UTC -->
