<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Large bank loses $7.9 billion: CDS involved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/large-bank-loses-7-9-billion-cds-involved.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/large-bank-loses-7-9-billion-cds-involved.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/large-bank-loses-7-9-billion-cds-involved.html#comment-56775</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/large-bank-loses-7-9-billion-cds-involved.html#comment-56775</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, so it seems that when a small investor (or even a large one) buys a &quot;naked short&quot; in the stock market, that is &quot;a bad thing&quot; because its a wager that stock prices will go down, no up.  OTOH, when major corporations buy a CDS, essentially a massive &quot;naked short&quot; that the object company will go bankrupt, that&#039;s &quot;a good thing&quot; because it&#039;s insurance against default.

So it&#039;s all right for corporations to protect themselves, but it&#039;s not all right for individuals to do so.

I think there may be a policy/regulatory implication in there somewhere, hopefully one that offers some consistency for investors of all sizes.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, so it seems that when a small investor (or even a large one) buys a &#8220;naked short&#8221; in the stock market, that is &#8220;a bad thing&#8221; because its a wager that stock prices will go down, no up.  OTOH, when major corporations buy a CDS, essentially a massive &#8220;naked short&#8221; that the object company will go bankrupt, that&#8217;s &#8220;a good thing&#8221; because it&#8217;s insurance against default.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s all right for corporations to protect themselves, but it&#8217;s not all right for individuals to do so.</p>
<p>I think there may be a policy/regulatory implication in there somewhere, hopefully one that offers some consistency for investors of all sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/large-bank-loses-7-9-billion-cds-involved.html/feed ) in 0.12103 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 4:00 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:00 am UTC -->
