<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the personal consumption data is important to the stock market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/06/why-the-personal-consumption-data-is-important-to-the-stock-market.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/06/why-the-personal-consumption-data-is-important-to-the-stock-market.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Phan</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/06/why-the-personal-consumption-data-is-important-to-the-stock-market.html#comment-56520</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Phan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=8901#comment-56520</guid>
		<description>hi Ed, thanks for the last 2 posts on Richard Koo. You&#039;re one of the few I&#039;ve seen who have highlighted his work. I recently finished Holy Grail, which you cited, and was quite taken by his analysis (really like how he synthesises the fiscal-monetary debate). However:
(i) I thought he skimmed over the Jap banking problem too quickly, by attributing the problems entirely to lack of demand for funds, without addressing to what extent a zombie banking sector held back recovery (except for a bit of data showing low bank interest rates and anemic loan growth even among foreign banks, which theoretically could have stepped in to fill the gap left by zombie dom banks if loan demand had been strong). (ii) Also, I was disturbed by his conclusion that the best thing the govt can do is borrow like mad, to replace corporate/household borrowing. Its certainly coming back to haunt Japan now, with debt at nearly 200% of GDP.
(iii) finally i&#039;m not sure how applicable the Jap policy measures are to the US now (though i think the analysis is applicable), as Koo argues that it was corp BS that got destroyed in Japan, while Jap households were able to draw down past years of savings to keep up consumption. In the US its households that have horrible BS, I&#039;m not so sure about corporates.

I&#039;m just wondering what you think of these points, and how much you agree with Koo&#039;s analysis, because I haven&#039;t seen much discussion of his work. (or perhaps I&#039;m not looking in the right places.)

matthew </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Ed, thanks for the last 2 posts on Richard Koo. You&#8217;re one of the few I&#8217;ve seen who have highlighted his work. I recently finished Holy Grail, which you cited, and was quite taken by his analysis (really like how he synthesises the fiscal-monetary debate). However:<br />
(i) I thought he skimmed over the Jap banking problem too quickly, by attributing the problems entirely to lack of demand for funds, without addressing to what extent a zombie banking sector held back recovery (except for a bit of data showing low bank interest rates and anemic loan growth even among foreign banks, which theoretically could have stepped in to fill the gap left by zombie dom banks if loan demand had been strong). (ii) Also, I was disturbed by his conclusion that the best thing the govt can do is borrow like mad, to replace corporate/household borrowing. Its certainly coming back to haunt Japan now, with debt at nearly 200% of GDP.<br />
(iii) finally i&#8217;m not sure how applicable the Jap policy measures are to the US now (though i think the analysis is applicable), as Koo argues that it was corp BS that got destroyed in Japan, while Jap households were able to draw down past years of savings to keep up consumption. In the US its households that have horrible BS, I&#8217;m not so sure about corporates.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just wondering what you think of these points, and how much you agree with Koo&#8217;s analysis, because I haven&#8217;t seen much discussion of his work. (or perhaps I&#8217;m not looking in the right places.)</p>
<p>matthew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kfizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/06/why-the-personal-consumption-data-is-important-to-the-stock-market.html#comment-56514</link>
		<dc:creator>kfizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=8901#comment-56514</guid>
		<description>Great post Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/06/why-the-personal-consumption-data-is-important-to-the-stock-market.html/feed ) in 0.12176 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 6:48 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 7:48 am UTC -->
