<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The U.S. is exporting unemployment with &#8216;Buy America&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/02/the-us-is-exporting-unemployment-with-buy-america.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/02/the-us-is-exporting-unemployment-with-buy-america.html</link>
	<description>Finance, Economics and Markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John Creighton</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/02/the-us-is-exporting-unemployment-with-buy-america.html#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>John Creighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=5637#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>I suppose in the interest of being fair that the best allocation of resources would mean producing things in the most cost efficient manner possible. However, countries look to benefit their country first and the world second. What is optimal in a global sense may not be optimal in a regional sense. 

Because taxation and social services are regional and not global the cost the government sees for procurement depends upon how much value was added within the country. When the United States is forced to accept the lowest bidder in a contract regardless of where the work is done then it can end up subsidizing foreign workers at the expense of local tax payers.

The opportunity cost from lost tax revenue due to foreign content is given by:

C=P*T(Pf+(r-1))

P=Cost of procurement
Pf=The fraction of the procurement cost spent overseas
T=Average Tax rate per dollar transaction (includes income plus sales tax)
r=The Money Multiplier

It is clear that the cost the government sees when procuring bids exceeds the value of the bid if there is value added outside of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose in the interest of being fair that the best allocation of resources would mean producing things in the most cost efficient manner possible. However, countries look to benefit their country first and the world second. What is optimal in a global sense may not be optimal in a regional sense. </p>
<p>Because taxation and social services are regional and not global the cost the government sees for procurement depends upon how much value was added within the country. When the United States is forced to accept the lowest bidder in a contract regardless of where the work is done then it can end up subsidizing foreign workers at the expense of local tax payers.</p>
<p>The opportunity cost from lost tax revenue due to foreign content is given by:</p>
<p>C=P*T(Pf+(r-1))</p>
<p>P=Cost of procurement<br />
Pf=The fraction of the procurement cost spent overseas<br />
T=Average Tax rate per dollar transaction (includes income plus sales tax)<br />
r=The Money Multiplier</p>
<p>It is clear that the cost the government sees when procuring bids exceeds the value of the bid if there is value added outside of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger Turtle</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/02/the-us-is-exporting-unemployment-with-buy-america.html#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranger Turtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/?p=5637#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>Since the U.S. exports very little compared to China, any protectionism would hurt China worse than the U.S.

Besides, my belief is that the intension was to keep the Stimulus Plan money in the U.S.  I for one, would not like to go into debt to give stimulus money to China or even Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the U.S. exports very little compared to China, any protectionism would hurt China worse than the U.S.</p>
<p>Besides, my belief is that the intension was to keep the Stimulus Plan money in the U.S.  I for one, would not like to go into debt to give stimulus money to China or even Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/02/the-us-is-exporting-unemployment-with-buy-america.html/feed ) in 0.12507 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 4:42 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:42 am UTC -->
