<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liquidity trap of a different sort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:48:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-a-different-sort.html#comment-18</guid>
		<description>SO Bob, what do you think will happen when these commodities implode and which ones will suffer?  All commodities are going through the roof right now: agricultural, metals and oil.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My bet is against the metals.  I don&#039;t believe in global de-coupling.  I think China will feel some serious pain when the US consumer stops buying and the whole argument for raw materials demand will come crashing down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO Bob, what do you think will happen when these commodities implode and which ones will suffer?  All commodities are going through the roof right now: agricultural, metals and oil.</p>
<p>My bet is against the metals.  I don&#8217;t believe in global de-coupling.  I think China will feel some serious pain when the US consumer stops buying and the whole argument for raw materials demand will come crashing down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BethesdaBob</title>
		<link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>BethesdaBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-a-different-sort.html#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Regarding the commodity bubble - we have a great capacity to formulate rational ideas why these bubbles form while they are forming, then great 20-20 hindsight after they burst. (What were we smoking????) In the case of the dot-com bubble, everyone rationalized the ridiculous asset prices based on the &quot;new economic paradigm&quot; that the Internet was expected to create. In the case of housing, everyone assumed that they could do an LBO on a piece of real estate with a presumed no-risk cash inflow to cover it. Now we rationalize the rise in commodity prices as a supply squeeze (&quot;suddenly&quot; everyone in the developing world is consuming more protein), as opposed to an inflation hedge because current interest rates don&#039;t compensate people for a real return plus a loss of purchasing power. Even long-term US rates are below the expectations for inflation (let&#039;s get real - the CPI is a joke)- hence the move towards assets that protect against monetary erosion. Watch out - as construction costs rise with inflation, that house may again become an attractive asset. And then there&#039;s the aftermath of the commodities bubble collapse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the commodity bubble &#8211; we have a great capacity to formulate rational ideas why these bubbles form while they are forming, then great 20-20 hindsight after they burst. (What were we smoking????) In the case of the dot-com bubble, everyone rationalized the ridiculous asset prices based on the &#8220;new economic paradigm&#8221; that the Internet was expected to create. In the case of housing, everyone assumed that they could do an LBO on a piece of real estate with a presumed no-risk cash inflow to cover it. Now we rationalize the rise in commodity prices as a supply squeeze (&#8221;suddenly&#8221; everyone in the developing world is consuming more protein), as opposed to an inflation hedge because current interest rates don&#8217;t compensate people for a real return plus a loss of purchasing power. Even long-term US rates are below the expectations for inflation (let&#8217;s get real &#8211; the CPI is a joke)- hence the move towards assets that protect against monetary erosion. Watch out &#8211; as construction costs rise with inflation, that house may again become an attractive asset. And then there&#8217;s the aftermath of the commodities bubble collapse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
