<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Liquidity trap of a different sort</title> <atom:link href="http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html</link> <description>a finance news and opinion site</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Edward Harrison</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html#comment-18</link> <dc:creator>Edward Harrison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-a-different-sort.html#comment-18</guid> <description>SO Bob, what do you think will happen when these commodities implode and which ones will suffer?  All commodities are going through the roof right now: agricultural, metals and oil.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My bet is against the metals.  I don&#039;t believe in global de-coupling.  I think China will feel some serious pain when the US consumer stops buying and the whole argument for raw materials demand will come crashing down.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO Bob, what do you think will happen when these commodities implode and which ones will suffer?  All commodities are going through the roof right now: agricultural, metals and oil.</p><p>My bet is against the metals.  I don&#8217;t believe in global de-coupling.  I think China will feel some serious pain when the US consumer stops buying and the whole argument for raw materials demand will come crashing down.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BethesdaBob</title><link>http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-different-sort.html#comment-17</link> <dc:creator>BethesdaBob</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2008/04/liquidity-trap-of-a-different-sort.html#comment-17</guid> <description>Regarding the commodity bubble - we have a great capacity to formulate rational ideas why these bubbles form while they are forming, then great 20-20 hindsight after they burst. (What were we smoking????) In the case of the dot-com bubble, everyone rationalized the ridiculous asset prices based on the &quot;new economic paradigm&quot; that the Internet was expected to create. In the case of housing, everyone assumed that they could do an LBO on a piece of real estate with a presumed no-risk cash inflow to cover it. Now we rationalize the rise in commodity prices as a supply squeeze (&quot;suddenly&quot; everyone in the developing world is consuming more protein), as opposed to an inflation hedge because current interest rates don&#039;t compensate people for a real return plus a loss of purchasing power. Even long-term US rates are below the expectations for inflation (let&#039;s get real - the CPI is a joke)- hence the move towards assets that protect against monetary erosion. Watch out - as construction costs rise with inflation, that house may again become an attractive asset. And then there&#039;s the aftermath of the commodities bubble collapse....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the commodity bubble &#8211; we have a great capacity to formulate rational ideas why these bubbles form while they are forming, then great 20-20 hindsight after they burst. (What were we smoking????) In the case of the dot-com bubble, everyone rationalized the ridiculous asset prices based on the &#8220;new economic paradigm&#8221; that the Internet was expected to create. In the case of housing, everyone assumed that they could do an LBO on a piece of real estate with a presumed no-risk cash inflow to cover it. Now we rationalize the rise in commodity prices as a supply squeeze (&#8220;suddenly&#8221; everyone in the developing world is consuming more protein), as opposed to an inflation hedge because current interest rates don&#8217;t compensate people for a real return plus a loss of purchasing power. Even long-term US rates are below the expectations for inflation (let&#8217;s get real &#8211; the CPI is a joke)- hence the move towards assets that protect against monetary erosion. Watch out &#8211; as construction costs rise with inflation, that house may again become an attractive asset. And then there&#8217;s the aftermath of the commodities bubble collapse&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: images.creditwritedowns.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.creditwritedowns.com @ 2010-03-21 13:21:03 -->